Why Sprocket
Everyone Has Agents Now.
Ask Who’s Accountable.
We published the rules ours run under.
The question stopped being whether AI can find a vulnerability — it can, and every vendor in this category now says so. The question is whether anyone can tell you what the agent did, where it was forbidden to go, why it stopped, and who checked its work. We publish all four, in a framework we wrote and hold ourselves to.
Every other model makes a compromise.
Sprocket takes the good parts of each and drops the trade-offs.
A snapshot that ages fast
Fine for a compliance signature. Less useful the moment anything changes, and things change constantly.
A dashboard on the old model
Better reporting, same cadence. The platform is continuous; the testing usually isn’t.
Fast, tireless, unaccountable
Automated tools are genuinely good at finding a path, and getting better fast. What they don’t do is stand behind the answer. Nobody’s name is on the finding, and nobody can tell you what the tool decided not to tell you.
Autonomy without a paper trail
The newest entrants run capable agents in production and describe the guardrails in a sentence or two on a product page. Ask for the scope-enforcement mechanism, the kill-switch bound, or the audit trail the agent cannot reach, and there is usually nothing to read.
Built for how attacks actually happen.
Technology for scale. Humans for accountability.
A safety framework you can actually read.
Context-aware, not generic.
Change detection that never sleeps.
Unlimited retests, and no coin-operated pricing.
Our own testers who stay on your account.
We pioneered Continuous Penetration Testing: expert-led offensive testing combining the best of AI agents, technology, and expert penetration testers that runs year-round, adapts as your environment changes, and answers “are we secure right now?”, not just “were we secure the week of the audit?”
What does continuous penetration testing mean to Sprocket?
It means your environment is tested year-round by real penetration testers, not sampled once and shelved until the next contract. As your attack surface shifts — new assets, new code, new exposures — we detect the change and test against it, so coverage keeps pace with reality instead of the calendar. Automated tooling handles scale and speed; our human experts handle judgment, chaining exploits, reasoning about your business, and validating what actually matters before anything reaches your report. And it genuinely never stops: unlimited retests, on-demand attestation, a live portal, and a published framework that tells you exactly what our agents are permitted to do.
“Are we secure right now?” becomes a question you can answer any day of the year — and “how do you know?” becomes one we can answer in writing.
Real risk is a person stringing weaknesses together.
the U.S. average cost of a data breach, up 14% year over year and an all-time high. Continuous testing is a rounding error against that number.
the average time to identify and contain a breach, up in 2026 and reversing five years of progress. Breaches past 200 days cost $1.33M more.
the collapse in organizations relying entirely on automated testing, in a single year. 78% report automated scanners missing critical vulnerabilities.
of U.S. security leaders name agent-led pentesting with human oversight as their preferred model. (n=200)
faster time to remediate using Sprocket Security over the industry average.
Credentials that hold up.
Trusted by teams keeping pace as they evolve:
Stop testing on a calendar. Start testing like an attacker.
Attackers are continuous. Now your testing can be too — and you can read exactly how it works before you buy.
Further Reading
Explore Latest Content.
How to Prepare for Penetration Testing
Preparing for a penetration test? This checklist will inform you on what to expect and what steps you should take to get the most out of your organization’s upcoming pentest. read more →
Read more